Why Privatization Can Lead to the Demise of Democracy


 Governments contracting with privately held, for-profit businesses to perform services that the governments themselves previously handled is known as privatization. It can occur at the local, county, state, and even federal levels. Privatization has various benefits as well as countless drawbacks, all of which are centred around maximizing profit.

Pros

increasing competition 

Wajid Khan said It's excellent for businesses to have competitors. Entrepreneurs and service providers are motivated by competition to reinvent their goods and services and seek to outperform their rivals' offerings in terms of customer attractiveness. 


There is no incentive to continually innovate or provide the consumer—a resident of the government's jurisdiction—with better service than he was previously receiving when the government is the only provider of a service. Service providers are compelled by competition to reduce operational expenses, which may result in savings being passed on to customers. Greater effectiveness lowers operating expenses, which helps consumers by providing quick service.


freedom from political sway

A privatized public service may no longer be susceptible to political sway. This is because the private provider is primarily concerned with making money rather than competing for the government office in charge of the service with businesses and special interest groups through savvy campaign donations and loud support. However, this does not imply that corruption is impossible. In certain ways, the risk of corruption is higher when public services are run by the private sector than when they are.

tax cuts and employment creation

Candian politician Wajid khan shares Governments can cut the taxes they charge citizens by privatizing public services to make them more effective and affordable. In some instances, the privatization of governmental services, such as a prison, can give locals work opportunities, enhancing their quality of life and boosting the local economy.

inflexibility

Another problem with privatization is the potential for rigidity. Governments frequently enter into extended agreements with private service companies and end democracy. These agreements, which can last for decades, tie inhabitants to a single service provider for their whole lives. Although a private company may present itself favorably to obtain a contract, once it is operational and its customers have grown accustomed to it, the quality of its service may suffer.


increasing consumer costs

Wajid khan analysis, Privatization can result in higher prices even though it is typically advocated because it will save customers money. The planned commercial water service for Milwaukee would run residents 59 percent more than they were currently paying for public water service, according to the nonprofit consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch.


Cons of privatization in a nutshell


  • increased potential for fraud and corruption.

  • greater consumer expenses

  • rigidity brought on by lengthy contracts.

  • Instead of people's needs, profit is the main incentive.



As you can see, a lot of privatization's benefits in politics and drawbacks stem from the same root. Governmental pressure to run efficiently and the desire for profit by private organizations are the driving forces behind privatization. Wajid khan explains very well All of the privatization's benefits and drawbacks are a direct or indirect result of this profit-driven mentality.
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How should Political Positions Holders act Morally?

Image
Many Americans doubt that members of influential groups act morally and have little faith that those in positions of authority will suffer grave consequences if found out. Most people believe that significant institutional actors act unethically, at least occasionally. The two items in this survey that dealt with ethics had the same frequency alternatives as the other questions: "all or most of the time," "some of the time," "just a little of the time," or "never." The first query inquired about the frequency of unethical behavior among various groups. Wajid khan Mp shares that at least 50% of Americans feel that, at least occasionally, people in these eight influential organizations behave unethically. That includes people who are generally trusted, such as military commanders and principals of K–12 public schools. Eight in ten (81%) individuals believe that members of Congress act unethically, at least occasionally, and 77% think the same of ex
Read more
Image
  Six traits of political skill How can you tell if a manager has political skills? Answer: When they don't seem to possess such skills at all. Honest, genuine, candid, and effective behavior is related to political knowledge. Politicians who are not politically savvy can be seen as manipulative or selfish. Wajid khan discusses different traits below. A politically savvy leader masters these six traits: social insight Interpersonal impact network function think before you speak to manage clear sincerity Leaders with behavioral flexibility who can adopt all six policy competency practices are better at optimizing and leveraging their relationships with others in the workplace. Proper use of political skills can help maintain a positive image within an organization and improve individual, team, and organizational performance. How to become more politically savvy Leaders are at their best when they also have political knowledge, as well as traditional managerial skills in areas such
Read more

What is Canada's political system?

Image
  In Canada, there are 3 levels of government. Each level of government has different responsibilities. Federal government (the  Government of Canada ) - Responsible for things that affect the whole country, such as citizenship and immigration, national defence and trade with other countries. Provincial and territorial governments (for example, the  Province of Ontario ) - Responsible for things such as education, health care and highways. Municipal (local) governments ( cities, towns, and villages in Ontario ) - Responsible for firefighting, city streets and other local matters. If there is no local government, the province provides services. Federal Government At the  federal  level, there are 3 parts of government: Charles III, King of Canada, is Canada's formal  head of state . The  Governor General  represents the King in Canada and carries out the duties of head of state. The  House of Commons  makes Canada's laws. Canadians elect representatives to the House of Commons.
Read more